14.
871
cormteb adë cilë ke naltoerme në zo te ble ai betiuper
•
c.dt
nb der bi də · oiveesoog nánd bea ezisc -"agong Icadɛzoq radio na stood,,ɛsložene,uimmimo dome sanquing dbus vel gr• „ÁLade newsoveð aất .SI
of heriu et ad Ilmvis odle resteg pieto od veg „panish
NOUB TEDTÔ Đidi To obtiv yd pokrzen istaszer von ob [Lode yanoqoq oɛach necɔeg geta að bæn DOLÉATOI
noinesneoq nealed plåsexequo à 10.
¿YouTů skút la sotiiv yo koyoidesó se bevamen te to
sde mɛewtod ne boergo ed Iaria es gaitanes
Labor, 2 ed ilem, az coitrenequico se veliavormuz's does
ed [Indɛ brova sunch banatz mom sad? '09
Lad
.Lomit
Toi se and around schD IN BEDDIE ĐI TỚI GI
sind wirus cidereg. coddranoquạo ra nakżetemROGʻI
a ed lindo eco matu le jaonanan maid to pažéɛjenec
sú llas: outpotesteky li quedemgiát re embarl
im: „colvrok predili və lavoli «'ydzejoli vill mi vo
DIA JUNGLE ANI in utryžiustisk ad i fins pri zadła
To ecap at Lede bunod biva and gd zoomløs emaltesep
to zeď av odd yɗ Lehiseb od caludqo Te upmovsitio
apa mežostak og spe
atzol od 10 nemyled nối od ¡late otestɛ knel
duísmora mud over emdoɛ orod sal binodi
ni noiđam in org add nå løntetigo egovog en robim noktaraqe etni -quind‚#101 „dmayak,did edt 1e ojtozeð dæmi:væð 500igned and redator điều tinh ? Line-ni-Tek int robindigo aal nh
Two deines of, mqonq zuded yonelfeovā ait. To reiv ni „Þ¢ÐI
clients in every way in his power, our clients feel justified in suggesting that His Excellency might be prepared to appoint a Board for the purpose of fixing the remuneration and compensation to be paid to the omers under the above schme.
Should the above scheme have been brought
into operation under the powers referred to in (A) above it is obvious from the decision in The China Mutual Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., v. Maclay reported in 198, 1 K.B. page 33 that althoug the Board of Arbitration referred to in the proclamation of the
3rd. August, 1915, might have pavers to assess the remuneration on a requisition basis it clearly has no power to assess the remuneration and compensation under the above scheme odas aquaitly whether the above is scheme has been brought inte operation under the legislation referred to in (▲) above or under other legisla-
-tion not referred to in this letter or merely on the basis of negotiation our clients feel further justified in suggesting that His Broellency might possibly see his way to communicate with the Home Authorities and obtain the necessary power to
appoint a Board of Arbitration here for the purpose at fixing the remneration and compensation to be paid to the omers under
the above scheme, and in the event of such a Board being appoint-
-ød, our clients consider that their interests should be fully
represented on such a Board, and that they should have a full
opportunity of placing their views before such Board, In con-
-nection with this suggestion, our clients desire to state that
they do not consider that the present members of the Sub-
-Committee here of the London Shipping Controller, are in a
position to fully or adequately represent our clients' interests
or that they should be called upon to do so. Further more our
olients feel that a local Beard of Arbitration is essential as
local conditions must be taken into consideration.
or
Our clients desire us to state that it is not
their
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.